Category Archives: Trinity

The Blood of God: Understanding the Atonement as a Work of the Trinity (A Reflection for Good Friday)

On this Good Friday, I would like to offer a reflection from Adam Johnson on the way in which we must understand the atonement accomplished in the crucifixion of Jesus as not merely a work of the Son, or of … Continue reading

Posted in Atonement, Doctrine of God, Gospel, Judgment of God, Karl Barth, Love of God, Seasonal, Soteriology, Trinity | 4 Comments

Undivided in Being and Act: Karl Barth on the Inseparable Operations of the Trinity

As a prelude to what I plan to post for Good Friday, I would like to offer Karl Barth’s summary of what St. Augustine called the orthodox faith of the catholic [universal] church, namely, that as the being of the Triune … Continue reading

Posted in Atonement, Augustine, Biblical interpretation, Doctrine of God, Karl Barth, Orthodoxy, Patristic theology, Trinity

Christ As Savior Before Creator: H.R. Mackintosh on the Significance of the Post-Resurrection Perspective of the Apostolic Witness

As I work my way through Scottish theologian H.R. Mackintosh’s magisterial work on The Doctrine of the Person of Jesus Christ, I continue to be illuminated and blessed by the riches that he was able to mine from the depths of the biblical … Continue reading

Posted in Apostle Paul, Biblical interpretation, Christology, Doctrine of God, Election, H.R. Mackintosh, Incarnation, Predestination, Reformed theology, Soteriology, T.F. Torrance, Trinity | 5 Comments

No One Knows the Father Except the Son: H.R. Mackintosh on the Radical Exclusivity of Revelation in Christ

In my efforts to better understand the theology of T.F. Torrance, I have turned also to one of his most significant influences: Hugh Ross Mackintosh. Mackintosh, a professor of dogmatics at New College in Edinburgh, played a particularly formative role on the development … Continue reading

Posted in Biblical interpretation, Christology, Doctrine of God, H.R. Mackintosh, Revelation, Scripture, T.F. Torrance, Trinity

God Was In Christ: Karl Barth on the Significance of God’s Being in his Act of Reconciliation

While explaining, in a recent post, why T.F. Torrance considered the traditional Calvinist doctrine of limited atonement to involve an implicit heretical Christology (Nestorianism, to be precise), I touched on the critical importance of Scripture’s affirmation that “God was in Christ … Continue reading

Posted in Apostle Paul, Christology, Five points of Calvinism, Gospel, Heresy/Heterodoxy, Incarnation, Karl Barth, Love of God, Reformed theology, Soteriology, T.F. Torrance, Trinity

How Not to Read the Bible: Modalist Edition

In this edition of “How Not to Read the Bible” (a series in which so far I have only written one article), I look at one of the fundamental interpretative errors that leads to the heresy of modalism, the notion … Continue reading

Posted in Biblical interpretation, Doctrine of God, Heresy/Heterodoxy, Karl Barth, Natural theology, Scripture, T.F. Torrance, Theological methodology, Trinity, Word of God

The Apostles’ Creed and the Election of Jesus Christ: Karl Barth on the Christ-Conditioned Nature of Divine Providence

To begin this post, I would simply like to quote a section from Christopher Green’s book Doxological Theology in which he examines Karl Barth’s formulation of the doctrine of divine providence in strict accordance with the inner theo-logic of the Apostles’ Creed (after … Continue reading

Posted in Assurance, Biblical interpretation, Christology, Classical theism, Creeds, Doctrine of God, Election, Heidelberg Catechism, Karl Barth, Patristic theology, Providence, Sovereignty of God, Theological methodology, Trinity

Reforming Calvinism, pt. 19: Irresistible Grace (The Lord and Giver of Life)

In the previous entry in my series Reforming Calvinism, I answered a question frequently raised regarding the vicarious humanity of Christ, namely, does Christ’s believing in our flesh and on our behalf lessen or eliminate the necessity and importance of our own faith? … Continue reading

Posted in Anthropology, Christology, Classic Calvinism, Creeds, Doctrine of God, Five points of Calvinism, Gospel, Holy Spirit, Incarnation, John Calvin, Karl Barth, Nature and grace, Orthodoxy, Patristic theology, Reformed theology, Reforming Calvinism, Sacramentalism, Soteriology, T.F. Torrance, Trinity, Union with Christ

“To Be or Not To Be (Natures or Persons)?”: Vanhoozer’s Question to Evangelical Calvinism, pt. 2

In my recent post “‘To Be or Not To Be (In Christ)’?: That is Kevin Vanhoozer’s Question to Evangelical Calvinism“, I offered an initial response to Vanhoozer’s critique of Evangelical Calvinism in his essay entitled “The Origin of Paul’s Soteriology: Election, Incarnation, … Continue reading

Posted in Anthropology, Biblical interpretation, Bobby Grow, Christology, Classic Calvinism, Creeds, Doctrine of God, Election, Evangelical Calvinism, Heresy/Heterodoxy, Holy Spirit, Homoousion, John Calvin, Karl Barth, Kevin Vanhoozer, Orthodoxy, Patristic theology, Predestination, Reformed theology, Scripture, Soteriology, T.F. Torrance, Trinity, Union with Christ, Universalism, Vicarious humanity of Christ

On Lingering Questions and the Nature of Theology

Yesterday I posted a response to one aspect of Kevin Vanhoozer’s critique of Evangelical Calvinism. This was inspired, in large part, by Bobby Grow’s own blog post to which Kevin Vanhoozer commented: I suppose my lingering question is this: if … Continue reading

Posted in Bobby Grow, Devotional, Evangelical Calvinism, Kevin Vanhoozer, Sin and evil, Soteriology, T.F. Torrance, Theological methodology, Theological science, Trinity, Vicarious humanity of Christ, Worship